Deloitte
6 位校友岗位:Graduate Program · Graduate Consulting · Platform Engineer · Web developer · Platform engineer
MGTS7618
课程定位 MGTS7618(Wise Leadership)是 UQ 管理学方向的重要课程,核心目标是把管理理论转化为可执行的组织决策与团队协作能力。课程不仅服务后续高阶管理与战略课程,也直接对应职场中的沟通协调、项目推进与跨团队管理场景。 技术栈与学习内容 内容通常覆盖组织行为、战略管理、领导力、运营改进、变革管理与商业沟通,并结合案例分析、情境决策和团队项目。你需要掌握的不只是概念本身,还要能在复杂约束下做取舍、说明理由、并输出可落地建议。 课程结构 课程一般按 13 周推进:前段打基础框架,中段进入案例与作业,后段综合评估。常见考核包括 Quiz/Tutorial、案例报告、小组展示和期末评估。评分除正确性外,更关注分析结构、论证深度与表达清晰度。 适合人群 适合希望提升管理思维、沟通表达、项目推进与团队协作能力的同学,尤其适合准备咨询、产品、运营、项目管理和综合管理岗位的人。建议每周稳定投入 8-12 小时,坚持“预习-练习-复盘”节奏。
Course decision
先看考核重心、截止节奏和入门要求,再决定这门课是否适合你的学期安排。
考核总权重
100%
4 项考核
最高单项
35%
Case Assignment
期末考试
有
以官方 outline 为准
Hurdle
未列出
当前考核表没有 Hurdle 标记
What you learn
学习成果来自官方 Unit Outline,关键词来自这门课的逐周主题。
Syllabus
默认只展示每周独有的知识重点;节奏、考核、Tutorial 和避坑信息按需展开。
### 📖 核心知识点:Introduction & Welcome Required Readings: Zhu, Rooney, & Phillips (2016; Academy of Management Learning and Education) 本周内容基于 UQ 官方 Course Profile 的学习活动安排。建议按“概念理解→练习验证→场景迁移”三步推进,确保知识能应用到作业与考试场景。 - **核心概念/公式**: Introduction & Welcome Required Readings: Zhu, Rooney, & Phillips (2016; Academy of Management Learning and Education), analysis, modelling, application ⏰ **本周节奏**: 难度 ⭐⭐⭐ | 预计投入 8h(Lecture 2h + 自学 3h + 作业/Lab 3h) 🎯 **考试关联**: 常见考法为概念辨析 + 场景应用,建议按“问题-方法-理由”组织答案。 🧪 **Tutorial/Lab**: 围绕“Introduction & Welcome Required Readings: Zhu, Rooney, & Phillips (2016; Academy of Management Learning and Education)”完成练习并复盘错因。 📌 **作业关联**: 对应本周作业模块,建议本周完成第一版。 ⚠️ **易错点**: 只记结论不做推导,综合题容易失分。 ,MGTS7618)
### 📖 核心知识点:What is Wisdom? Required readings: Gluck & Weststrate (2022; Personality and Social Psychological Review) NOTE: In this lecture, teaching staff will introduce themselves and we will review the structure of the course. We will describe the steps you can take to most efficiently and enjoyably achieve your best performance in the course. 本周内容基于 UQ 官方 Course Profile 的学习活动安排。建议按“概念理解→练习验证→场景迁移”三步推进,确保知识能应用到作业与考试场景。 - **核心概念/公式**: What is Wisdom? Required readings: Gluck & Weststrate (2022; Personality and Social Psychological Review) NOTE: In this lecture, teaching staff will introduce themselves and we will review the structure of the course. We will describe the steps you can take to most efficiently and enjoyably achieve your best performance in the course., analysis, modelling, application ⏰ **本周节奏**: 难度 ⭐⭐⭐ | 预计投入 8h(Lecture 2h + 自学 3h + 作业/Lab 3h) 🎯 **考试关联**: 常见考法为概念辨析 + 场景应用,建议按“问题-方法-理由”组织答案。 🧪 **Tutorial/Lab**: 围绕“What is Wisdom? Required readings: Gluck & Weststrate (2022; Personality and Social Psychological Review) NOTE: In this lecture, teaching staff will introduce themselves and we will review the structure of the course. We will describe the steps you can take to most efficiently and enjoyably achieve your best performance in the course.”完成练习并复盘错因。 📌 **作业关联**: 对应本周作业模块,建议本周完成第一版。 ⚠️ **易错点**: 只记结论不做推导,综合题容易失分。 ,MGTS7618)
### 📖 核心知识点:What is Wise Leadership? Required Readings: Sternberg (2008; Leadership Quarterly) Grossmann & Brienza (2018; Journal of Intelligence) Nonaka & Takeuchi (2011; Harvard Business Review) 本周内容基于 UQ 官方 Course Profile 的学习活动安排。建议按“概念理解→练习验证→场景迁移”三步推进,确保知识能应用到作业与考试场景。 - **核心概念/公式**: What is Wise Leadership? Required Readings: Sternberg (2008; Leadership Quarterly) Grossmann & Brienza (2018; Journal of Intelligence) Nonaka & Takeuchi (2011; Harvard Business Review), analysis, modelling, application ⏰ **本周节奏**: 难度 ⭐⭐⭐ | 预计投入 8h(Lecture 2h + 自学 3h + 作业/Lab 3h) 🎯 **考试关联**: 常见考法为概念辨析 + 场景应用,建议按“问题-方法-理由”组织答案。 🧪 **Tutorial/Lab**: 围绕“What is Wise Leadership? Required Readings: Sternberg (2008; Leadership Quarterly) Grossmann & Brienza (2018; Journal of Intelligence) Nonaka & Takeuchi (2011; Harvard Business Review)”完成练习并复盘错因。 📌 **作业关联**: 对应本周作业模块,建议本周完成第一版。 ⚠️ **易错点**: 只记结论不做推导,综合题容易失分。 ,MGTS7618)
### 📖 核心知识点:Social Practice Wisdom and Design Thinking Required Readings: Collins (2001; Harvard Business Review) Nonaka & Takeuchi (2011; Harvard Business Review) 本周内容基于 UQ 官方 Course Profile 的学习活动安排。建议按“概念理解→练习验证→场景迁移”三步推进,确保知识能应用到作业与考试场景。 - **核心概念/公式**: Social Practice Wisdom and Design Thinking Required Readings: Collins (2001; Harvard Business Review) Nonaka & Takeuchi (2011; Harvard Business Review), analysis, modelling, application ⏰ **本周节奏**: 难度 ⭐⭐⭐ | 预计投入 8h(Lecture 2h + 自学 3h + 作业/Lab 3h) 🎯 **考试关联**: 常见考法为概念辨析 + 场景应用,建议按“问题-方法-理由”组织答案。 🧪 **Tutorial/Lab**: 围绕“Social Practice Wisdom and Design Thinking Required Readings: Collins (2001; Harvard Business Review) Nonaka & Takeuchi (2011; Harvard Business Review)”完成练习并复盘错因。 📌 **作业关联**: 对应本周作业模块,建议本周完成第一版。 ⚠️ **易错点**: 只记结论不做推导,综合题容易失分。 ,MGTS7618)
### 📖 核心知识点:Wise Leadership in Practice The Threat of Foolishness and Overconfidence Required Readings: Sternberg (2018; Research in Human Development) Sternberg (2004; European Psychologist) 本周内容基于 UQ 官方 Course Profile 的学习活动安排。建议按“概念理解→练习验证→场景迁移”三步推进,确保知识能应用到作业与考试场景。 - **核心概念/公式**: Wise Leadership in Practice The Threat of Foolishness and Overconfidence Required Readings: Sternberg (2018; Research in Human Development) Sternberg (2004; European Psychologist), analysis, modelling, application ⏰ **本周节奏**: 难度 ⭐⭐⭐ | 预计投入 8h(Lecture 2h + 自学 3h + 作业/Lab 3h) 🎯 **考试关联**: 常见考法为概念辨析 + 场景应用,建议按“问题-方法-理由”组织答案。 🧪 **Tutorial/Lab**: 围绕“Wise Leadership in Practice The Threat of Foolishness and Overconfidence Required Readings: Sternberg (2018; Research in Human Development) Sternberg (2004; European Psychologist)”完成练习并复盘错因。 📌 **作业关联**: 对应本周作业模块,建议本周完成第一版。 ⚠️ **易错点**: 只记结论不做推导,综合题容易失分。 ,MGTS7618)
### 📖 核心知识点:Obstacles to Wise Leadership—Part 1: The Threat of Foolishness and Toxicity Illusion, Bias, & Bullshit Required Readings: Stanovich, West, & Toplak (2013; Current Directions in Psychological Science) Christensen, Karreman, & Rasche (2019; Organization Studies) 本周内容基于 UQ 官方 Course Profile 的学习活动安排。建议按“概念理解→练习验证→场景迁移”三步推进,确保知识能应用到作业与考试场景。 - **核心概念/公式**: Obstacles to Wise Leadership—Part 1: The Threat of Foolishness and Toxicity Illusion, Bias, & Bullshit Required Readings: Stanovich, West, & Toplak (2013; Current Directions in Psychological Science) Christensen, Karreman, & Rasche (2019; Organization Studies), analysis, modelling, application ⏰ **本周节奏**: 难度 ⭐⭐⭐ | 预计投入 8h(Lecture 2h + 自学 3h + 作业/Lab 3h) 🎯 **考试关联**: 常见考法为概念辨析 + 场景应用,建议按“问题-方法-理由”组织答案。 🧪 **Tutorial/Lab**: 围绕“Obstacles to Wise Leadership—Part 1: The Threat of Foolishness and Toxicity Illusion, Bias, & Bullshit Required Readings: Stanovich, West, & Toplak (2013; Current Directions in Psychological Science) Christensen, Karreman, & Rasche (2019; Organization Studies)”完成练习并复盘错因。 📌 **作业关联**: 对应本周作业模块,建议本周完成第一版。 ⚠️ **易错点**: 只记结论不做推导,综合题容易失分。 ,MGTS7618)
### 📖 核心知识点:Obstacles to Wise Leadership—Part 2: The Threat of Blindspots: Bias & Bullshit Intellectual Humility and Seeing Through Illusion Required Readings: Morris, Brotheridge, & Urbanski (2005; Human Relations) McKee & Barber (1999; International Journal of Aging and Human Development) 本周内容基于 UQ 官方 Course Profile 的学习活动安排。建议按“概念理解→练习验证→场景迁移”三步推进,确保知识能应用到作业与考试场景。 - **核心概念/公式**: Obstacles to Wise Leadership—Part 2: The Threat of Blindspots: Bias & Bullshit Intellectual Humility and Seeing Through Illusion Required Readings: Morris, Brotheridge, & Urbanski (2005; Human Relations) McKee & Barber (1999; International Journal of Aging and Human Development), analysis, modelling, application ⏰ **本周节奏**: 难度 ⭐⭐⭐ | 预计投入 8h(Lecture 2h + 自学 3h + 作业/Lab 3h) 🎯 **考试关联**: 常见考法为概念辨析 + 场景应用,建议按“问题-方法-理由”组织答案。 🧪 **Tutorial/Lab**: 围绕“Obstacles to Wise Leadership—Part 2: The Threat of Blindspots: Bias & Bullshit Intellectual Humility and Seeing Through Illusion Required Readings: Morris, Brotheridge, & Urbanski (2005; Human Relations) McKee & Barber (1999; International Journal of Aging and Human Development)”完成练习并复盘错因。 📌 **作业关联**: 对应本周作业模块,建议本周完成第一版。 ⚠️ **易错点**: 只记结论不做推导,综合题容易失分。 ,MGTS7618)
### 📖 核心知识点:Practicing Wisdom—Part 1: Humility and Seeing Through Illusion (know thy blindspots) Self-Awareness and Authenticity Required readings: Eurich (2018; Harvard Business Review) George, Sims, McLean, & Mayer (2007; Harvard Business Review) 本周内容基于 UQ 官方 Course Profile 的学习活动安排。建议按“概念理解→练习验证→场景迁移”三步推进,确保知识能应用到作业与考试场景。 - **核心概念/公式**: Practicing Wisdom—Part 1: Humility and Seeing Through Illusion (know thy blindspots) Self-Awareness and Authenticity Required readings: Eurich (2018; Harvard Business Review) George, Sims, McLean, & Mayer (2007; Harvard Business Review), analysis, modelling, application ⏰ **本周节奏**: 难度 ⭐⭐⭐ | 预计投入 8h(Lecture 2h + 自学 3h + 作业/Lab 3h) 🎯 **考试关联**: 常见考法为概念辨析 + 场景应用,建议按“问题-方法-理由”组织答案。 🧪 **Tutorial/Lab**: 围绕“Practicing Wisdom—Part 1: Humility and Seeing Through Illusion (know thy blindspots) Self-Awareness and Authenticity Required readings: Eurich (2018; Harvard Business Review) George, Sims, McLean, & Mayer (2007; Harvard Business Review)”完成练习并复盘错因。 📌 **作业关联**: 对应本周作业模块,建议本周完成第一版。 ⚠️ **易错点**: 只记结论不做推导,综合题容易失分。 ,MGTS7618)
### 📖 核心知识点:Tutorial 5: Project Development Prepare for Week 9 round table discussion, mentorship and feedback 本周内容基于 UQ 官方 Course Profile 的学习活动安排。建议按“概念理解→练习验证→场景迁移”三步推进,确保知识能应用到作业与考试场景。 - **核心概念/公式**: Tutorial 5: Project Development Prepare for Week 9 round table discussion, mentorship and feedback, analysis, modelling, application ⏰ **本周节奏**: 难度 ⭐⭐⭐ | 预计投入 8h(Lecture 2h + 自学 3h + 作业/Lab 3h) 🎯 **考试关联**: 常见考法为概念辨析 + 场景应用,建议按“问题-方法-理由”组织答案。 🧪 **Tutorial/Lab**: 围绕“Tutorial 5: Project Development Prepare for Week 9 round table discussion, mentorship and feedback”完成练习并复盘错因。 📌 **作业关联**: 对应本周作业模块,建议本周完成第一版。 ⚠️ **易错点**: 只记结论不做推导,综合题容易失分。 ,MGTS7618)
### 📖 核心知识点:Practicing Wisdom—Part 3: Wise Reasoning: A Simple Step Toward Wisdom Wise Reasoning--Reducing Bias and Improving Cooperation Required Readings: An important aspect of wisdom and wise leadership is seeking truth . Seeking truth includes an ability to understand and interpret scientific studies. This week's readings include scientific studies on "wise reasoning" that report statistics. Your instructor is an expert in this area, so use this opportunity to practice reading and interpreting scientific reports; come to class with questions about the studies and what they mean for developing wisdom and wise leadership. Brienza, Kung, & Chao (2021; Nature Communications) Grossmann, Brienza, & Bobocel (2017; Nature Human Behaviour) Labour Day Public Holiday - Monday 4th May 2026 - Check Blackboard for announcements about affected classes. 本周内容基于 UQ 官方 Course Profile 的学习活动安排。建议按“概念理解→练习验证→场景迁移”三步推进,确保知识能应用到作业与考试场景。 - **核心概念/公式**: Practicing Wisdom—Part 3: Wise Reasoning: A Simple Step Toward Wisdom Wise Reasoning--Reducing Bias and Improving Cooperation Required Readings: An important aspect of wisdom and wise leadership is seeking truth . Seeking truth includes an ability to understand and interpret scientific studies. This week's readings include scientific studies on "wise reasoning" that report statistics. Your instructor is an expert in this area, so use this opportunity to practice reading and interpreting scientific reports; come to class with questions about the studies and what they mean for developing wisdom and wise leadership. Brienza, Kung, & Chao (2021; Nature Communications) Grossmann, Brienza, & Bobocel (2017; Nature Human Behaviour) Labour Day Public Holiday - Monday 4th May 2026 - Check Blackboard for announcements about affected classes., analysis, modelling, application ⏰ **本周节奏**: 难度 ⭐⭐⭐ | 预计投入 8h(Lecture 2h + 自学 3h + 作业/Lab 3h) 🎯 **考试关联**: 常见考法为概念辨析 + 场景应用,建议按“问题-方法-理由”组织答案。 🧪 **Tutorial/Lab**: 围绕“Practicing Wisdom—Part 3: Wise Reasoning: A Simple Step Toward Wisdom Wise Reasoning--Reducing Bias and Improving Cooperation Required Readings: An important aspect of wisdom and wise leadership is seeking truth . Seeking truth includes an ability to understand and interpret scientific studies. This week's readings include scientific studies on "wise reasoning" that report statistics. Your instructor is an expert in this area, so use this opportunity to practice reading and interpreting scientific reports; come to class with questions about the studies and what they mean for developing wisdom and wise leadership. Brienza, Kung, & Chao (2021; Nature Communications) Grossmann, Brienza, & Bobocel (2017; Nature Human Behaviour) Labour Day Public Holiday - Monday 4th May 2026 - Check Blackboard for announcements about affected classes.”完成练习并复盘错因。 📌 **作业关联**: 对应本周作业模块,建议本周完成第一版。 ⚠️ **易错点**: 只记结论不做推导,综合题容易失分。 ,MGTS7618)
### 📖 核心知识点:Organisational Challenges to Wise Leadership: Crises and Navigating Organisational Bullshit | Special Guest: Hardo Manik Leading Through Crises and Organisational Bullshit Required Readings: Collins, Dasborough, Gregg, Xu, Deen, He, & Restubog (2022; The Leadership Quarterly) McCarthy, Hannah, Pitt, & McCarthy (2020; Business Horizons) 本周内容基于 UQ 官方 Course Profile 的学习活动安排。建议按“概念理解→练习验证→场景迁移”三步推进,确保知识能应用到作业与考试场景。 - **核心概念/公式**: Organisational Challenges to Wise Leadership: Crises and Navigating Organisational Bullshit | Special Guest: Hardo Manik Leading Through Crises and Organisational Bullshit Required Readings: Collins, Dasborough, Gregg, Xu, Deen, He, & Restubog (2022; The Leadership Quarterly) McCarthy, Hannah, Pitt, & McCarthy (2020; Business Horizons), analysis, modelling, application ⏰ **本周节奏**: 难度 ⭐⭐⭐ | 预计投入 8h(Lecture 2h + 自学 3h + 作业/Lab 3h) 🎯 **考试关联**: 常见考法为概念辨析 + 场景应用,建议按“问题-方法-理由”组织答案。 🧪 **Tutorial/Lab**: 围绕“Organisational Challenges to Wise Leadership: Crises and Navigating Organisational Bullshit | Special Guest: Hardo Manik Leading Through Crises and Organisational Bullshit Required Readings: Collins, Dasborough, Gregg, Xu, Deen, He, & Restubog (2022; The Leadership Quarterly) McCarthy, Hannah, Pitt, & McCarthy (2020; Business Horizons)”完成练习并复盘错因。 📌 **作业关联**: 对应本周作业模块,建议本周完成第一版。 ⚠️ **易错点**: 只记结论不做推导,综合题容易失分。 ,MGTS7618)
### 📖 核心知识点:Sticking to Wisdom: Resilience and the Constant Challenge of Toxicity | Special Guest: Alex McBroom Courage, Resilience, and Dealing with Toxicity Required Readings: Coutu (2002; Harvard Business Review) Padilla et al. (2007). The Leadership Quarterly. 本周内容基于 UQ 官方 Course Profile 的学习活动安排。建议按“概念理解→练习验证→场景迁移”三步推进,确保知识能应用到作业与考试场景。 - **核心概念/公式**: Sticking to Wisdom: Resilience and the Constant Challenge of Toxicity | Special Guest: Alex McBroom Courage, Resilience, and Dealing with Toxicity Required Readings: Coutu (2002; Harvard Business Review) Padilla et al. (2007). The Leadership Quarterly., analysis, modelling, application ⏰ **本周节奏**: 难度 ⭐⭐⭐ | 预计投入 8h(Lecture 2h + 自学 3h + 作业/Lab 3h) 🎯 **考试关联**: 常见考法为概念辨析 + 场景应用,建议按“问题-方法-理由”组织答案。 🧪 **Tutorial/Lab**: 围绕“Sticking to Wisdom: Resilience and the Constant Challenge of Toxicity | Special Guest: Alex McBroom Courage, Resilience, and Dealing with Toxicity Required Readings: Coutu (2002; Harvard Business Review) Padilla et al. (2007). The Leadership Quarterly.”完成练习并复盘错因。 📌 **作业关联**: 对应本周作业模块,建议本周完成第一版。 ⚠️ **易错点**: 只记结论不做推导,综合题容易失分。 ,MGTS7618)
### 📖 核心知识点:Course Wrap-Up, Q&A for Final Assignment 本周内容基于 UQ 官方 Course Profile 的学习活动安排。建议按“概念理解→练习验证→场景迁移”三步推进,确保知识能应用到作业与考试场景。 - **核心概念/公式**: Course Wrap-Up, Q&A for Final Assignment, analysis, modelling, application ⏰ **本周节奏**: 难度 ⭐⭐⭐ | 预计投入 8h(Lecture 2h + 自学 3h + 作业/Lab 3h) 🎯 **考试关联**: 常见考法为概念辨析 + 场景应用,建议按“问题-方法-理由”组织答案。 🧪 **Tutorial/Lab**: 围绕“Course Wrap-Up, Q&A for Final Assignment”完成练习并复盘错因。 📌 **作业关联**: 对应本周作业模块,建议本周完成第一版。 ⚠️ **易错点**: 只记结论不做推导,综合题容易失分。 ,MGTS7618)
Assessment
Quiz / Tutorial
检验 MGTS7618 的阶段掌握。
Case Assignment
案例分析或书面作业。
Group Presentation
团队展示与表达评估。
Final Exam / Final Assessment
期末综合评估。
Assignments
完成 MGTS7618 案例问题分析与结论输出。
重点: 框架应用与论证逻辑
要求:提交结构化报告
⏱ 预计 12 小时
完成综合管理情境分析并提出执行建议。
重点: 方案设计与风险评估
要求:提交报告/展示材料
⏱ 预计 16 小时
Reviews
4.0
难度
4.0
含金量
3.0
压力
2.0
教师评分
做Extended Challenge Activity前后都会做一个survey,在写report写是尽量选择差值比较大有代表性的去写。在Appendix的部分可以放一些图片来支撑wise reward/wise penalty/training process. presentation时最好可以脱稿,pre的内容需要将theory和case结合起来深入的研究和讨论。
From Seniors
基础信息谁都查得到,真正值钱的是过来人的经验。
比你早一年的学长留下的真实经验 —— ChatGPT 给不了。
这门课还没有学长经验,你可以是第一个 —— 注册后在课内分享。
这门课暂无往年考点记录。
下面是匠人学院毕业生整体去过的公司分布(来自脱敏校友证言)。这是全平台的总体去向,不代表选这门课的人一定去这些公司。
统计自 317 份脱敏校友证言
岗位:Graduate Program · Graduate Consulting · Platform Engineer · Web developer · Platform engineer
岗位:Frontend Dev · junior frontend developer · Front-end Developer · Full Stack Developer
岗位:Full-stack Developer · Data Engineer · Consultant
关于这块数据,我们说实话
雇主墙来自脱敏毕业生证言(testimonials)的整体分布,无法关联到具体学员或其所选课程;仅作为毕业生去向的总体社会证明展示。
我们没有"某位学长选了这门课、后来进了哪家公司"这种可查询的个人去向档案 —— 校友证言是脱敏的,无法关联到具体的人或他选过的课。所以这里只给整体分布,不给个人路径,不编。